At this point in your career, three quarters of the way through your first year, I think it's completely natural and entirely okay to struggle with nailing down which teaching tradition you most closely identify with. Life experiences, personality, and environment probably contribute to some people having a more natural bent toward one tradition or the other, however, for others of us; it’s more of a career-long process. As the years go by you’ll be forearmed with the ability to reflect on yourself, students, and context and as a result, you’ll be a better teacher for it. Your description of not having 25 pieces of student work that look the same made me smile and warmed my heart. Not having much experience with high school kids, I don’t feel qualified to give you any advice as far as respect and motivation. I think your heart and head are in the right place though and something tells me that you’ll figure it out.
Reflection
I have loved this book. I think it should be required reading for all teachers. I've already offered to loan my copy to my administrator. What's more, he sounded like he wanted to read it! As the authors say, teaching is a complicated business, we blend different traditions, and "...we(as teachers and adults)change over time." (p 52) For me, it was clear to see that I tend to value a progressive approach, it's just the way I am. However, I would say that it's been a growth process to reach this point where I can look back and actually see it and give it a name. Right now I am struggling to refine my blend. I'm picturing a scale with meaning on one side, and a balance of skills, social justice, and ah ha moments on the other side. As much as I strive to perfect the equation, it's always changing. I think I'm hardwired to appreciate achievement, to strive for excellence. The more I learn about this messy business though, the more I realize that my satisfaction has to come from the process, not an end product. The day I think I've got it all figured out will be the day I need to hang up my teaching smock for good! (For some reason this brings tears to my eyes...teaching is a messy business indeed!)
Beth,
I hope your district appreciates what a gem they have in
you! When I read your blog posts it’s as though I am putting on a pair of reading
glasses because your perspectives bring such new clarity to my understanding.
You relate that your family experienced situational poverty
after your father left, and that plans for after high school were never
discussed. I grew up in a fairly dysfunctional family and have no recollection
of anyone, not even my high school counselor, discussing my plans for after
high school. I had always earned good grades, and college was always a personal
goal, it was entirely of my own volition that it became a reality. I wore out
my entire Sharpie gel highlighter on pages 58-61 because I identified with the
students having fewer economic resources. I don’t feel that my own public schooling
presented, as Hirsh describes “… a carefully sequenced and well-delineated core
knowledge curriculum.” I had teachers that I admired, but none that really
mentored me. It made me question Hirsch’s theories, as I seemed to be a
contradiction. You also say that you gained a lot of knowledge from books. We
have that in common too. I have always been a voracious reader. It makes me wonder what other factors
contribute to a child breaking free from the “Matthew Effect?”(p 60)Reflection
Though my parents weren't the Cleaver's there was always a strong foundation of love for my two brothers and I. We didn't visit museums, the theatre, or many places beyond the boundaries of our small rural community, however, we had the freedom to explore our world. In the summer we played with our neighborhood chums, outdoors from near sunrise, until after dark. When rain or snow kept us inside we read or played board games. Neither of my parents had a college education yet they would engage in spirited conversations on topics ranging from politics to religion and all points in between. They too, were compulsive readers.
I realize that times have changed, that children don't have as many opportunities to roam and explore on their own. That families spend less time together than in the days of my childhood. Research conducted by the National Endowment for the Arts (2007) indicated that people read less. I understand that I am venturing away from conservative traditions and art education here, but I'm interested in the big picture. What characteristics DO people who break free from the "Matthew Effect" have in common and how do art educators foster inquiry which contributes to the growth of knowledge, understanding, and self-efficacy? Sounds like a good topic for research...